| |
Issues discussed:
- Duty hours:
a. Large variation among programs in methods of tracking:
- Review of a specific 4 week cycle(s) of all resident hours (to stand as representation sample)
- Spot checks of a cross section of residents on all rotations at a particular point in time
- Attestation statement linked to the rotation evaluation ("I have not violated duty hour regulations on this rotation")-problematic if the RRC wants to see specific work hours
- Sample of specific rotations
- Paper and pencil, on-line (various vendors-New Innovations seems most popular, at least in the region), swipe cards
- Dealing with violations-what is the definition of program compliance?
- Residents staying beyond their shifts-individual residents must be accountable, Program Director speaks with individual residents inclined to stay, changing the culture
- Programs must have a way for residents to report violations confidentially
- Many programs have compliance as the default and resident attests
- Unclear how many violations, handled in what way would constitute compliance problem per the RRC
Conclusion: We will know what is accecptable as RRC completes site visits of programs
- Remediation of resident knowledge/skill/attitude-how to fit it into the work week
- Residents who are struggling cannot simply stay longer to get their work done, some may be cutting corners (eg: not writing notes) in order to get out on time
- Need to develop a PDlearning module on organization and efficiency
- Bright Futures has a time management module we could adapt
- Since time at work is shorter and needs to be focused on patient care, residents must have the expectation that they will go home and READ
Conclusion: There is good work that our regional groups could do in this area.
- Incorporating the Competencies into Learning Goals and Objectives
- General agreement that not every competency needs to be taught or assessed on each rotation
- Competency should be defined by level of training
- Faculty need to be involved in defining competency and developing methods of assessment
Conclusion: There is much sharing of methods that can be done at our regional APPD meetings in fall.
- Technology
- Learning Technology Task Force will work to make computer-based learning modules available on the APPD website for programs to use and review.
- Consider a survey of APPD membership: what do you have that works, what do you need?
- Consider linking with curriculum task force to develop Likert scales for web-based curricula
Conclusion: Shared learning modules would be a great asset
- Conference attendance
- Programs need to set a standard for the proportion of "required conferences" residents need to attend and motivate residents to attend:
- Emphasize conference attendance at intern orientation, instill as part of the culture
- Improve quality of conferences
- Book funds as a reward for attending required conferences
- Make attendance part of the permanent record
- Tie to assessment of professionalism: "point system" for violations
- Show residents the ABP form assessing professionalism as a condition for Board Eligibilty
- Give extra call for falling below expectations
- Some programs have devoted a weekly 3 hour block of protected time to didactics instead of 3 separate hour long conferences
- Chiefs initially held pagers until the culture changed
- 45 minute talks, specialty specific blocks, case-based
Conclusion: Program attendance methods vary but there appear to be many effective methods
- Program Coordinators are interested in meeting with Program Directors at the Regional meeting, they have much to contribute and not all can get to the National meeting
Conclusion: Inviting Program Coordinators and chief Residents to regional meeting would be a real asset.
ACTION PLAN:
- Invite Program Coordinators and Chief Residents to the fall Regional meeting (John Mahan at Columbus is happy to host).
Friday, October 22, 2004 from 10:00 - 3:00 has been identified as the date for the Regional Meeting
- Develop a module on organizational skills-remediation, time managment
- survey members and chiefs to see who would like to work on this
- Continue to share experience with RRC site visits re: duty hours compliance, competency assessment, etc
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Hofkosh, MD
|